Despite $ 33M in support, the FCC has sent only 1 CARES telehealth provider

• The Federal Communications Commission has provided only one provider to expand telehealth equipment, despite more than $ 33 million in Congressional funding so far, FCC chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement Tuesday to the subcommittee.

• To receive a payment from the FCC, eligible customers must submit a receipt with the invoice of the Service and Equipment. It should be a control against waste and fraud, but it can increase administrative responsibilities for employers and make it harder for them to get the money they believe.

• So far, the FCC has received only invoice assistance from the vendor in the program, Pai said. A company spokeswoman told Health Dive: “We expect the rate to increase gradually as more funds support it.”

The $ 2.2 trillion coronavirus subsidy, grant, and financial security bill passed by Congress in March saw a $ 200 million mark for providers to build telehealth infrastructure, IT networks, and hardware forward.

Since the first funding was released in mid-April, the FCC program from COVID-19 telemedicine has already received funding from 89 providers in 30 states and six rounds of sponsorship, as well as more than $ 33 million in funding, Pai told the committee on Housaleo’s communications and technology Tuesday.

The FCC approved the sixth and final round of funding on May 13th and expects to announce further approval in the next few days.

Pai said, “We are still receiving and organizing fast. I can say that this is our priority.”

However, the FCC expects substantial financial support when only one service provider receives payment. Although the FCC declined to provide billing details, the recommended amount is only $ 5,886 for the Bethesda Community Clinic in Georgia up to $ 1 million each for unpaid education professionals such as the Mayo Clinic and Oschner Health System.

Behemoth Health Systems and Independent Family Practices poured in resources to raise their eye care donations to recoup their much-needed funding and attendance.

Implementation for hardware and essential software can be high, especially for small events: tens of thousands may be spent depending on the provider, the level of the practice, EHR, and other factors. This is why federal funding is so important, employers say – and why is it a problem that the FCC authorizes it but does not receive additional funding.

“There is a huge problem getting money at the door,” Congresswoman Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., Said at the meeting, highlighting the need to reward employers quickly for their telemedicine efforts.

However, the FCC estimates that more dollars will flow as soon as the program matures, provides additional funding, and additional funding is available. The company predicts that the $ 200 million pot may not be enough as the need for telemedicine continues over the year, even though it is “too early to say for sure,” he said. Pai said.

Communication television equipment has been under intense pressure during this epidemic as millions of Americans have been working hard, taking classes online, and contacting their doctors via telemedicine. Pai, who became chairman of the FCC in January 2017, testified that the U.S. network is sustaining a much-needed increase due to significant investments in broadband infrastructure in recent years.

Self-employed and the public have taken steps to improve access to affordable care and increase costs despite rising costs for patient housing. But there is much work to be done to break the barrier, Pai said, arguing the state should consider removing or restoring local drug licensing services, as well as an old-fashioned rebate system that pays for visits. ala.